Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:S. Naga Vamsi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: deleted under G5 by Doug Weller. (non-admin closure) jlwoodwa (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Draft:S. Naga Vamsi should be deleted because it is a less-complete version of Draft:S Naga Vamsi. They were both created by the same editor Ustadeditor2011. They cover the same topic. It makes no sense having both. -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
To add from my side, I know this guy is good, notable producer with movies which I have seen, also know for his comments against youtube reviews and all. Would like to work on this subject. Admins can delete one, and can tell on which one to work on. I can work upon it. - Herodyswaroop (talk) 12:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - We, the editors at MFD, do not need waste our volunteer time reading two drafts to determine which one is more complete and which one should be deleted. They can be left in draft space, where perhaps one of them will be worked on and accepted into article space. If either of them is ignored for six months, it will expire. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:36, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Advice to User:Herodyswaroop - If you are interested in working on one of these drafts, you can review them, and decide which one is better to start with, and improve it. My recommendation to MFD is that we leave the task of deciding which one is better to you, or to any editor who wants to work on a draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.